Template literals require you to stick a blank string after the comment: /*. */ syntax, just like in regular JavaScript. Eta gives you more flexibility with delimeters - you could set them to to mimic template literals.Instead, Eta uses ~ to output a raw value Eta allows left whitespace control (with -), something that doesn't work in EJS because EJS uses - on the left side to indicate that the value shouldn't be escaped.Eta compiles and renders templates much faster than EJS.Eta weighs less than 2.5KB gzipped, while EJS is 4.4KB gzipped Here are the differences between Eta and EJS: Created by the developers of Squirrelly, it's written in TypeScript and emphasizes phenomenal performance, configurability, and low bundle size.Ģ.3KB minzipped size restricted to " %> compiles correctly, while it fails with doT or EJSĮta's syntax is very similar to EJS' (most templates should work with either engine), Eta has a similar API, and Eta and EJS share the same file-handling logic. Documentation - Chat - RunKit Demo - PlaygroundĮta is a lightweight and blazing fast embedded JS templating engine that works inside Node, Deno, and the browser.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |